![]() So, the original VideoMic Go’s 34dBa is quite appalling and probably explains, at least partly, my issues with the microphone. Meanwhile, anything above 25dBa is considered extremely noisy and therefore unusable. Between 10-16dBA is still regarded as good enough for the studio, though it may need a little help in the post. To put this into context, anything below 10 dBa is considered studio worthy. Most importantly, the VideoMic Go II also has less self-noise, so it’s less likely to act up and introduce unwanted noise.Ĭompared to the original Go’s self-noise rating of 34dBa, the Go II’s 15dBa is a significant improvement, which is about as low as you can expect from a small diaphragm microphone. The Go II also has a better dynamic range than the first, allowing it to capture quieter and louder sounds. As a result, the Go II has a broader frequency range, meaning it can capture higher and lower-frequency sounds than the original. Inside the tube, Rode has wholly retooled the microphone from its predecessor. The VideoMic Go II uses the same tube shape as Rode’s high-end NTG and NTG5 microphones, which Rode refers to as “annular line tube technology.” While the small quality-of-life improvements are always welcome, how it performs matters most and doesn’t disappoint. The new shock mount has improved functionality, making it easier to tuck away cables of varying thicknesses. Rode further improved the shock mount with multiple grooves for cable management. The shock mount is another upgrade, and I did notice when walking around for a vlog that I didn’t pick up on any harsh vibrations. The pop filter also doesn’t cover up the entirety of the microphone like the original, and it’s easier to change out filters than before. Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar set by the original Go, but the Go II isn’t a rote product update.įor starters, the Go II is much smaller than the original, almost by half. ![]() The fact that the VideoMic Go II works and doesn’t produce static in recordings is reason enough to be impressed. After testing the VideoMic Go II for the past few months-the microphone was provided to me by Rode-its stable performance, crisp sound, and additional functions have all but made up for the sins of the previous iteration. So I was surprised when the Rode VideoMic Go II was announced, thinking it would be the same old song. With audio for several videos ruined, I looked to the Deity V-Mic D4 Duo, a less expensive option with unique features. The Rode VideoMic Go II sounds better than the original and comes in a smaller package. Other accounts online made similar claims. Unfortunately, as I have written previously, the Rode VideoMic Go turned out to be a terrible microphone, which suffered from static so heavy it made any audio unusable. ![]() It saved me from purchasing a lesser microphone from an unknown brand.Īfter all, Rode is known for its high-end microphones and attention to quality sound, but I was proved wrong. The original budget shotgun microphone from Rode seemed like a great addition. When I purchased my first mirrorless, it came bundled with a Rode VideoMic Go. The Rode VideoMic Go II is a sub-$100 microphone much better than the original, with bonus features perfect for creators on a budget. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |